Star News
Opportunities resources that allowed to implement the practice. Methodology for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population and development
Order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation of April 6, 2017 No. 690/pr "On approval of the methodology for evaluating competitive bids municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring favorable environment life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice"
In accordance with paragraph 5 of the Government Decree Russian Federation dated August 18, 2016 No. 815 “On the All-Russian Competition “Best Municipal Practice” (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2016, No. 35, Art. 5335) I order:
1. Approve the methodology for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" in accordance with this order.
2. The Department of the Urban Environment (O.N. Demchenko) no later than 10 days from the date of signing, send this order for state registration to the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.
3. To impose control over the execution of this order on the Deputy Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation A.V. Lapwing.
| Minister | M.A. men |
Application
APPROVED
Ministry of Construction
and housing and communal services
Russian Federation
dated April 6, 2017 No. 690/pr
Methodology
evaluation of competitive bids of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice"
1. This Methodology determines the procedure for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competitive application).
2. Evaluation of competitive applications is carried out by the subcommittee of the federal competition commission for organizing and holding the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competition) in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter referred to as the Subcommittee).
3. The sub-committee evaluates the bids by assigning points for items 3-11 of section II of the bid based on the indicators provided for in the Table contained in this Methodology (hereinafter referred to as -).
4. Indicators are determined taking into account the following:
a) the indicators provided for in the , , , Table are assigned by the members of the Subcommittee a score in the range indicated in the Table, depending on the extent to which, in the opinion of the member of the subcommittee, this indicator is applicable to the practice being assessed;
b) the indicators provided for in the Table are assigned points in accordance with the share of extrabudgetary funds in the total cost of practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);
c) indicators provided by , , , , , , Tables, in case of a positive answer, index 5 is assigned, in case of a negative one - 0;
d) the indicators provided for in the Table, in case of a positive answer, an index of 10 is assigned, in case of a negative answer - 0;
e) the indicator provided for in the Table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budgetary funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% or more - 0).
| No. p \ p | Name of indicator | Score in points |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Short description the situation that necessitated the implementation of the practice | ||
| 1.1. | The practice was implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban planning policy, to ensure a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | 0-10 |
| 1.2. | The practice was implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality | 0-5 |
| 2. Problems that should have been solved by the implementation of the practice | ||
| 2.1. | The implemented practice was carried out in order to solve a problem or a set of problems typical for a number of Russian municipalities | 0-10 |
| 2.2. | Implemented practice provided a solution to a specific problem in the framework of the development strategy of the municipality | 0-5 |
| 2.3. | The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of better connectivity and transport accessibility of facilities and services on the territory of the municipality | 0-10 |
| 2.4. | The implemented practice has provided a solution to the problem of involving the population in the decision-making process in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | 0-10 |
| 2.5. | Implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of adapting to the use of objects cultural heritage | 0-5 |
| 2.6. | Implemented practice ensured improvement of the environmental situation on the territory of the municipality | 0-10 |
| 2.7. | Implemented practice provided a solution to the problems of people with limited mobility | 0-5 |
| 3. Opportunities (resources) that made it possible to implement the practice | ||
| 3.1. | Practice implemented using grants from charitable organizations and/or funds public organizations, private donations | 0-10 |
| 3.2. | The practice was implemented using local community funds | 0-10 |
| 3.3. | The practice was implemented with the involvement of citizens' funds (means of self-taxation of citizens or another form) | 0-10 |
| 3.4. | The practice was implemented with the involvement of residents as contractors | 5 |
| 3.5. | The practice was implemented with the involvement of private investment | 0-10 |
| 4. Results of the implementation of practice in measurable quantities | ||
| 4.1. | The results of the implementation of the practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the corresponding values of the indicators provided for in this Table | 5 |
| 5. Economic and/or social effects from the implementation of the practice | ||
| 5.1. | The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of a demanded public territory in the municipality | 0-5 |
| 5.2. | The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal vehicles in favor of public transport(including taxi) | 0-5 |
| 5.3. | The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal vehicles in favor of walking | 0-10 |
| 5.4. | The implementation of the practice results in a reduction in the consumption of energy or other resources on the territory of a given municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population | 0-5 |
| 5.5. | The implementation of the practice results in the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | 0-10 |
| 5.6. | The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, and other practices that are unique to this municipality. | 0-5 |
| 5.7. | The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the status of a resident of this municipality | 0-5 |
| 5.8. | The implementation of the practice results in savings in the budget of the municipality | 0-5 |
| 5.9. | The implementation of the practice results in an increase in municipal budget revenues | 0-10 |
| 5.10. | The implementation of the practice results in the saving of personal time of residents of the municipality | 0-10 |
| 5.11. | The implementation of the practice results in a reduction in the risk of injuries arising from the functioning of elements of urban infrastructure, landscaping and transport | 0-10 |
| 5.12. | The implementation of the practice results in an improvement in the health of residents of the municipality | 0-10 |
| 5.13. | The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the number of residents of the municipality | 0-10 |
| 5.14. | The implementation of the practice results in an influx of people visiting the territory of the municipality | 0-5 |
| 5.15. | The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the field of providing services to the population | 0-10 |
| 5.16. | The implementation of the practice results in the emergence on the territory of the municipality of objects for the implementation of entrepreneurial activities | 0-5 |
| 6. Beneficiaries | ||
| 6.1. | The direct beneficiary of the implementation of the practice is the local government as a body that manages the municipal economy | 5 |
| 6.2. | The direct beneficiary of the implementation of the practice is an identifiable group of people (for example, people with limited mobility) | 5 |
| 6.3. | The direct beneficiaries of the implementation of the practice are those who carry out entrepreneurial activity in the field of providing services to the population | 5 |
| 6.4. | Direct beneficiaries are all residents of the municipality | 10 |
| 7. Participants of the implementation project | ||
| 7.1. | Implemented practice was carried out at the initiative of citizens, public organizations, associations of entrepreneurs | 5 |
| 7.2. | The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of a common idea, concept and practice | 5 |
| 7.3. | The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of specific design solutions or the selection of options for design solutions. | 5 |
| 7.4. | The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the implementation of the practice, its implementation | 5 |
| 8. Actions to deploy the practice (a list of activities that have been undertaken in order to implement the practice) | ||
| 8.1. | A list of activities that have been undertaken in order to implement the practice (roadmap) is presented | 5 |
| 9. Legal support implementation of the practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing the practice) | ||
| 9.1. | The implementation of the practice was carried out without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework | 10 |
| 9.2. | The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local governments with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities | 5 |
| 10. Project implementation costs | ||
| 10.1. | Attracting funds from the budgets of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the practice | 0-10 |
| 11. Measures to improve the implementation of practice - recommendations | ||
| 11.1 | Implemented practice is replicable | 0-10 |
| 11.2 | Presentation materials are clear and high quality | 0-5 |
| 12 | Persons responsible for the implementation of the practice in the municipality, ready to provide advice to persons interested in replicating the practice | 5 |
5. The total score for the competitive application is calculated by the formula:
The total score for the i-th competitive application;
c - the number of members of the subcommittee who evaluated the competitive application;
The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee on the application of the i-th municipality according to this Methodology;
The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee on the application of the i-th municipality according to this Methodology.
6. The municipal formation, the competitive application of which is assigned the highest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.
Document overview
The methodology for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice" has been approved.
Evaluation indicators are defined. The formula for calculating the total score for the competitive application is given.
The assessment is carried out by a subcommittee of the federal competition commission for the organization and holding of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice" in the above nomination.
7.1. All applications submitted for the Competition are subject to a preliminary examination by employees of the Agency's regional representative office. The term for the preliminary examination is 5 working days. If the submitted applications do not meet the requirements set forth in clause 6.1 of these Regulations, the Application shall be sent for revision. The deadline for finalizing the application is 5 working days, but no later than the deadline for the 1st stage of the Competition. Regional representative offices of the Agency maintain a register of received and rejected applications. Based on the results of the examination, the Representative Office of the Agency sends a general package of applications from the relevant federal district to the Agency.
7.2. The Agency conducts the collection, study and preliminary assessment for further consideration at the meetings of the Expert Jury.
When evaluating the works, the Expert Jury is guided by the following main criteria:
Objective achieved effects from the implementation of the Project;
The uniqueness of the model or approach;
Possibility of using the model or approach in other regions;
Social effect from the implementation of the Project.
7.3. The expert jury conducts a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the Projects received as part of the applications. The evaluation is carried out for the purpose of competitive selection of the most interesting and significant Projects and determination of the finalists of the competition. At the end of the 3rd stage of the Competition, the Expert Jury prepares proposals for 3 finalists in each nomination for further submission to the meeting of the Board of Trustees.
VIII. Summing up the Competition
8.1. The Board of Trustees sums up the results of the Contest and determines the winners of the Contest within the 4th stage of the Contest.
8.2. There is one winner in each category. At the same time, the Board of Trustees has the right to increase the number of winners in each nomination.
8.3. The results of the Contest are announced within the framework of the Russian Investment Forum (Sochi).
8.4. Based on the results of the Competition, a library of Projects will be formed. According to the projects of the finalists of the Competition, the Agency develops guidelines in the format of "Ready-made solutions" for further placement in the information system "Region-ID".
8.5. The results of the Competition will be covered in the media and specialized periodicals.
IX. Other conditions
9.1. In accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Board of Trustees has the right to terminate the Competition at any time before the results of the Competition are summed up. In this case, the notification of the rejection of all applications for participation in the Tender or the termination of the Tender shall be immediately sent by the Agency to all participants of the Tender.
9.2. The Agency, members of the Board of Trustees and the Expert Jury are not responsible for the failure of the Contest participant to receive information or the receipt of incorrect information about the Contest if the Contest participant received such information unofficially.
Application No. 1
to CEO
Autonomous non-profit organization
"Agency for Strategic Initiatives
to promote new projects"
S.V. Chupsheva
Notification
about participation in the All-Russian competition
best practices and initiatives for socio-economic development
in the subjects of the Russian Federation
I ask you to organize consideration of the application ______________________________________________________________
(name of the subject of the Russian Federation)
as part of the All-Russian competition of best practices and initiatives for socio-economic development in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
I have read and agree with the conditions and requirements of the competitive selection.
For participation, please contact those responsible for the implementation of the Projects indicated in the attached summary of the Projects.
I guarantee the accuracy of the information provided in the bid.
Applications: 1) passports of Projects for ____l. in 1 copy;
2) description of Projects for ____l. in 1 copy;
3) presentation of Projects on electronic media;
4) confirmation of the description and results of the implementation of Projects for ____l. in 1 copy.
top official
subject of the Russian Federation ___________
Application No. 2
Project Passport
1. Name of practice
3. Prerequisites for implementation
Brief description of the situation that led to the implementation of the practice
Opportunities that made it possible to implement the practice:
5. Participants of the implementation project
6. Brief description of the business model for implementing the practice
8. Regulatory support for the implementation of the practice - what regulatory legal acts have been developed or approved in order for the practice to be implemented.
Adopted legal acts:
Changed legal acts:
9. Beneficiaries (stakeholders): region, entrepreneurs, residents
10. Project implementation costs:
Application No. 3
Contact Information
Appendix 3
Approved
by order of the Ministry of Construction
dated _____________ 2017 N _______
METHODOLOGY
EVALUATION OF COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS OF MUNICIPALITIES,
PRESENTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE NOMINATION "URBAN PLANNING
POLICY, PROVISION OF A FAVORABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING AND UTILITIES»
OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN COMPETITION "BEST MUNICIPAL PRACTICE"
1. This Methodology determines the procedure for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competitive application).
2. Evaluation of competitive applications is carried out by the subcommittee of the federal competition commission for organizing and holding the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competition) in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the population's life and development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter referred to as the Subcommittee).
3. The subcommittee evaluates the bids by assigning points for items 3-11 of section II of the bid on the basis of the indicators provided for in the Table contained in paragraph 4 of this Methodology (hereinafter referred to as the Table).
4. Indicators are determined taking into account the following:
a) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1.1 - 1.2, 2.1 - 2.7, 5.1 - 5.16, 11.1 - 11.2 of the Table, the members of the Subcommittee are assigned points in the range indicated in the Table, depending on the extent to which, in the opinion of the member of the subcommittee, this indicator applicable to the practice being assessed;
b) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 3.1 - 3.3, 3.5 of the Table are assigned points in accordance with the share of extrabudgetary funds in the total cost of practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);
c) indicators provided for in paragraphs 3.4, 5.1, 6.1 - 6.3, 7.1 - 7.4, 8.1, 9.2, 12 of the Table, in case of a positive answer, index 5 is assigned, in case of a negative answer - 0;
d) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 6.4, 9.1 of the Table, in case of a positive answer, an index of 10 is assigned, in case of a negative answer - 0;
e) the indicator provided for in paragraph 10.1 of the Table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budget funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% or more - 0).
Name of indicator | Score in points |
|
1. Brief description of the situation that necessitated the implementation of the practice |
||
The practice was implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban planning policy, to ensure a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | ||
The practice was implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality | ||
2. Problems that should have been solved by the implementation of the practice |
||
The implemented practice was carried out in order to solve a problem or a set of problems typical for a number of Russian municipalities | ||
Implemented practice provided a solution to a specific problem in the framework of the development strategy of the municipality | ||
The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of better connectivity and transport accessibility of facilities and services on the territory of the municipality | ||
The implemented practice has provided a solution to the problem of involving the population in the decision-making process in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | ||
Implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of adaptation to the use of cultural heritage sites | ||
Implemented practice ensured improvement of the environmental situation on the territory of the municipality | ||
Implemented practice provided a solution to the problems of people with limited mobility | ||
3. Opportunities (resources) that made it possible to implement the practice |
||
The practice was implemented using grants from charitable organizations and / or funds from public organizations, private donations | ||
The practice was implemented using local community funds | ||
The practice was implemented with the involvement of citizens' funds (means of self-taxation of citizens or another form) | ||
The practice was implemented with the involvement of residents as contractors | ||
The practice was implemented with the involvement of private investment | ||
4. Results of the implementation of practice in measurable quantities |
||
The results of the implementation of the practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the corresponding values of the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1 - 3, 5 - 8 of this Table | ||
5. Economic and/or social effects from the implementation of the practice |
||
The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of a demanded public territory in the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of private vehicles in favor of public transport (including taxis) | ||
The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal vehicles in favor of walking | ||
The implementation of the practice results in a reduction in the consumption of energy or other resources on the territory of a given municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population | ||
The implementation of the practice results in the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment for the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services | ||
The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, and other practices that are unique to this municipality. | ||
The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the status of a resident of this municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in savings in the budget of the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in an increase in municipal budget revenues | ||
The implementation of the practice results in the saving of personal time of residents of the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in a reduction in the risk of injuries arising from the functioning of elements of urban infrastructure, landscaping and transport | ||
The implementation of the practice results in an improvement in the health of residents of the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the number of residents of the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in an influx of people visiting the territory of the municipality | ||
The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the field of providing services to the population | ||
The implementation of the practice results in the emergence on the territory of the municipality of objects for the implementation of entrepreneurial activities | ||
6. Beneficiaries |
||
The direct beneficiary of the implementation of the practice is the local government as a body that manages the municipal economy | ||
The direct beneficiary of the implementation of the practice is an identifiable group of people (for example, people with limited mobility) | ||
The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice are persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the field of providing services to the population | ||
Direct beneficiaries are all residents of the municipality | ||
7. Participants of the implementation project |
||
Implemented practice was carried out at the initiative of citizens, public organizations, associations of entrepreneurs | ||
The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of a common idea, concept and practice | ||
The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of specific design solutions or the selection of options for design solutions. | ||
The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the implementation of the practice, its implementation | ||
8. Actions to deploy the practice (a list of activities that were taken in order to implement the practice) |
||
A list of activities that have been undertaken in order to implement the practice (roadmap) is presented | ||
9. Legal support for the implementation of the practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing the practice) |
||
The implementation of the practice was carried out without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework | ||
The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local governments with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities | ||
10. Project implementation costs |
||
Attracting funds from the budgets of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the practice | ||
11. Measures to improve the implementation of practice - recommendations |
||
Implemented practice is replicable | ||
Presentation materials are clear and of high quality. | ||
Persons responsible for the implementation of the practice in the municipality, ready to provide advice to persons interested in replicating the practice |
5. The total score for the competitive application is calculated by the formula:
Ii - the total score for the i-th competitive application;
c - the number of members of the subcommittee who evaluated the competitive application;
The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee on the application of the i-th municipality under subparagraph "a" of paragraph 4 of this Methodology;
The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee on the application of the i-th municipality in subparagraphs "b" - "e" of paragraph 4 of this Methodology.
6. The municipal formation, the competitive application of which is assigned the highest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.
