Big encyclopedia of oil and gas. secular society

the beauty

secular society. What is "light"?

In the classical era, "secular" meant worldly and opposed to the church. In the 19th century, secular began to be understood as belonging to a “good society”, or simply “society”, as it was customary to say in those days.

Ride out into the light : "My father was not in the world" writes Remusat, talking about the Hundred Days, an era when his father did not visit anyone except Madame Devin. So, "going out into the world" means "going to salons."

The expression "man of the world," according to Robert's dictionary, has three meanings. Ancient: a person of noble birth; obsolete: courtier, courtier; modern: "A person who lives in a society and knows the norms adopted there." In the era we are interested in, the concept of “secular person” had a completely definite social meaning, just like “politician” or “writer”: all the more so because in the same salon one could sometimes meet bearers of all these titles at the same time. Talking about a certain evening, Remusat reports that among the guests, only two were “simply secular people,” that is, they lived on rent and spent time in salons.

The aristocrats of the Restoration era understand "light" exclusively as a collection of persons admitted to the court. However, to think so means to forget two important circumstances: firstly, the skills of secular communication were characteristic not only of the court circle, and secondly, the court society also evolved: the court of the Restoration era and the court of the July Monarchy are not at all the same .

Indeed, if until 1830 the court and the Faubourg Saint-Germain were connected by many ties, the same faces shone both at the court and in the salons of the Faubourg, then under the July Monarchy, on the contrary, the inhabitants of the Faubourg for the most part left the court. Since Louis Philippe was often reproached for accepting people indiscriminately at his court, it no longer occurred to anyone to identify secular society with court society.

Under the July Monarchy, complaints about the changes taking place all around become commonplace. What these changes consisted of, explains Remusat. On the one hand, "the last representatives of the society of the XVIII century", which he still found in his youth, "died, decrepit or dispersed." On the other hand, " new part society that has risen thanks to the revolution "did not create new forms of secular communication, and the atmosphere that reigned in it was" colorless and barren. The court consisted of ordinary people, the government of people of the most diverse origins, and this mixture of representatives of many classes gave rise to embarrassment and lowered everyone to the level of mediocrity.

Of course, the innumerable variations on the theme “secular society is no more” were generated primarily by the feeling that the society that existed under the Old Order had irrevocably disappeared. Secular ladies, who still remembered the salons of the 18th century, pre-revolutionary salons, gradually passed away, and with them the aristocratic ability to live, to talk, to joke disappeared. One image that appears under the pen of Remus is symbolic. The style of the last century clashes with the style of the new century: a high society lady walks hand in hand with a swindler. This is the last appearance of Madame de La Briche in the pages of Remus' Memoirs.

This change in style is often attributed to the significant role that politics began to play during these years. Virginia Anselo developed this idea in detail in two of her books on salons - books that reflected her personal experience for this lady, born in 1792, received guests in her salon under four powers, from the Restoration to the Second Empire, and knew "all Paris" for half a century. Madame Anselo was the wife of an academician and herself composed plays that were successful. During the Restoration, the Anselo couple occupied one of the apartments in the La Rochefoucauld mansion, on Seine Street, and during the July Monarchy they moved to a small house on Joubert Street, in the Chaussé d'Antin quarter. According to Ms. Anselo, after 1830 in the salons of any political passions prevailed: the inhabitants of the Faubourg Saint-Germain were sullen and angry; they lacked those who, following the deposed king and his family, left Paris; however, the supporters of the new government were also dissatisfied and little inclined to secular communication: they "so often were attacked by newspapermen and deputies, which they could not hide their concerns and anxieties.

The world is a whole galaxy of salons, circles, court parties, which are constantly striving to expand their sphere of influence, but this expansion is carried out disorderly and inconsistently, especially after 1830, when the Faubourg Saint-Germain breaks with the new power, and the court, having opened access to the Tuileries to almost everyone, he loses his prestige.

The courtyard of the Restoration era, for all its severity, played the role of a center. The court of the July Monarchy could not play this role. Victor Balabin, secretary of the Russian embassy, ​​who arrived in Paris in May 1842, had reason to write on January 20, 1843: “Every society needs a center; here the center does not exist; here there are only parties that are not connected with each other in any way - scattered members of a body crippled by revolutions. Each of them is a leaf torn from the great book of national history.

People familiar with other capitals emphasize that it is extremely difficult to understand the secular geography of Paris. After spending eighteen years in Paris, Rudolf Appogny never ceases to be amazed at this society, "having no boundaries." Anyone who wants to gain fame here is just right to despair. How do you know who sets the tone? Whose position to seek? In London, it is enough to be received in the house of Duke X, or appear in public in the company of Lady Y, in order to be entitled to be called a man of the world. In Paris, on the contrary, “you have to win this title again and again every day in each of the salons; here no one recognizes anyone's authority; yesterday's success does not help you today; the favorite of one salon is not known to a single living soul in the house opposite.

So, it is extremely difficult for a visitor to understand secular relationships. In April 1835, Prince Schönburg, the envoy of the Austrian emperor, cannot understand why, no matter how much he makes inquiries, he still cannot form a clear idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe French world. Rudolf Appony notes in this connection: “To judge the speeches made by the French, it is not enough to know which party they belong to; one must also take into account what position they took before the July Revolution, whether they were in opposition, and if so, for what reason; in addition, we must try to find out what circumstances forced them to take the side of Louis Philippe, whether they are sincerely committed to him or whether they share the opinion of the government only on certain issues.

To understand all these problems, a whole topology was invented at the time described. Parisian light was divided into quarters: the Faubourg Saint-Germain, the Faubourg Saint-Honoré, the Chaussé d'Antin quarter, the Marais quarter. This made it possible to determine by the address of the mansion which of the secular "parties" its inhabitant belongs to.

However, fame and luxury are by no means synonymous. Some of the famous salons of the Rue Sèvres, Rue Fermes-de-Mathurin, Rue Royale, huddle in two-room flats. Their mistresses in the past either moved in the big world themselves, or had a fortune sufficient to make acquaintances there, and maintained these contacts by moving to more modest dwellings.

Such migrations took place in the era of the Restoration - the post-revolutionary era, when people grew rich and poor so rapidly that it was possible not to lose secular ties, even if they went bankrupt. But under the July Monarchy, money began to play a decisive role. This is confirmed by the example of James Rothschild. The banker Rothschild was already very rich in the Restoration era, but at that time secular society boycotted him. In gratitude for the personal services rendered, he asked Metternich for the diplomatic post of the Austrian consul in Paris, and in this rank he gained access to many salons, the doors of which would not have opened before him if he were a simple banker. Under Louis Philippe, the baron no longer needed a diplomatic post in order to occupy a dominant position in the world: the magnificent festivities he organized were to the taste of all those invited, and at court his presence was considered an honor.

Let us return, however, to secular geography. The names of the four quarters are connected with the real geography of Paris only very approximately. You can live in the Faubourg Saint-Honore, but be part of the Faubourg Saint-Germain. The names of the quarters indicate not so much the place of residence, but rather the socio-political affiliation of this or that person and his attitude to the spirit of the times and innovations. This gives Delphine de Girardin the basis in 1839 to describe the quarters, taking their relationship to fashion as a starting point. It turns out this: the Chaussé d'Antin quarter, like ministers, proposes. The Faubourg Saint-Honoré, like the Chamber of Deputies, approves. The Faubourg Saint-Germain, like the Chamber of Peers, consecrates. life.

Highway d'Antin . Chaussée d'Antin is a quarter on the right bank of the Seine, located between the Boulevard des Italiens and rue Saint-Lazare. In the east it is bounded by rue Faubourg Montmartre and rue Martyrs, in the west by rue Arcade and Grove. At the end of 1836, in this quarter was built a luxurious new temple - the Church of Our Lady of Loreto.

At the beginning of the 18th century, the Porcheron quarter was a large forest area, consisting of parks that belonged to tax-farmers, and vast lands that were in the possession of the abbey of the Canonesses of Montmartre. In 1720, when the quarter began to be divided into plots for sale, it was called the Gaillon quarter, and then they began to call the Chaussé d'Antin quarter - after the name of the main street. In 1793, this street was crossed into Mont Blanc street, but in 1815 year, the name of the Highway d'Antin was finally returned to her. From the second half of the 18th century, financiers and artists began to settle here, thus laying the foundation for a tradition that continued into the next century.

This area of ​​Paris began to be actively built up during the Restoration era. In the 1820s, here between the Rue La Rochefoucauld and Tour de Dame on the one hand, and the Rue Blanche and Saint Lazare on the other, the "New Athens" arose. And nearby, between the streets of La Rochefoucauld and Martyrs, starting from 1823, a part of the quarter, called Saint-Georges, began to be built.

According to a tradition dating back to the 18th century, artists settled next to representatives of the business world in the Chaussé d'Antin quarter.

Famous actors also lived in the Highway d'Antin quarter: Mademoiselle Mars, Mademoiselle Duchenois, Talma. Arnal, a comedian from the Vaudeville Theater, lived in the Jockey Club mansion in 1843, at the intersection of Grange Batelier Street and Italian Boulevard. Mademoiselle Mars, who bought the Three Brothers property in 1822, sold it in 1829. The architect Crécy demolished the old building and built a new house on the same spot, called the Orleans Square, where many artists lived, in 1840 Sister Malibran, a singer Pauline Viardot with her husband, and the great dancer Marie Taglioni, in 1842 Georges Sand, Chopin and Kalkbrenner, the great pianist, Liszt's rival The house at 56 rue Faubourg Poissonnière, completed in 1838, belonged in 1840 to Delestre-Poirson, composer of vaudevilles and a theatrical entrepreneur, at first he lived there himself, and then sold the mansion to Alexandre-Charles Sauvageot, former first violin in the orchestra of the Opera.Singers Dupre and Roger (the second from the Opéra-Comique) lived in a mansion on the Rue Rochechouart.

The Chaussée d'Antin quarter, which symbolized dynamism and modernity due to its proximity to the Grands Boulevards, also had a reputation for a bustling realm of wealth and fashion.

Mare. The quarters differed from one another in manners, attire, manner of speaking, and these differences were very significant. Therefore, in order to succeed in Parisian society, it was necessary to know by what criteria people in each of the quarters were judged. Arriving at the respectable gentlemen from an old noble family living in the Marais quarter, a young dandy from the Chaussé d'Antin quarter with his cigars, buzzwords and peremptory judgments like: “this is absurd” and “this is colossal”, “this old bastard” and "this out of his mind blockhead," had every chance to frighten the stiff relatives of his bride and not get her hand.

On the opposition of the Highway d'Antin and Marais, Balzac's story “The Secondary Family” is built. When the prosecutor Granville, having married a devout provincial, comes with her to Paris, then, at the request of Madame Granville, they settle in Marais, at the corner of Vieille du -Temple, not far from the church.M. de Granville himself would prefer to live in the Chaussé d'Antin quarter, "where everything is young and full of life, where fashions are in all their novelty, where an elegant public walks along the boulevards, and to theaters and other entertainment venues within easy reach. To please his wife, Granville agrees to "bury himself in Mare," but he settles his mistress on Thébou Street, in the heart of the Chaussé d'Antin. Limited people live in the old center of Paris. If they say about a person that he "grew up in Mare ", which means that, even having moved to the Faubourg Saint-Germain, he will sin with the most vulgar stinginess. The Scandalous Chronicle magazine mocks a certain Madame d" Ange ... who, having settled in one of the mansions of Saint-Germain suburbs, constantly suffers from the thought that guests will “spoil” something in its luxurious halls. She visits her magnificent apartments only on reception days, but lives in the apartment on the floor above, among cheap furniture. The ancient families from the Marais quarter, which by their origin could claim a significant role in the world, are lost against the backdrop of the bright, ostentatious secularity of the Highway d'Antin.

Faubourg Saint Honoré. Charles de Remusat refers to himself as a member of the "circle of the Faubourg Saint-Honoré". From 1797 to 1868, he changed fourteen apartments (not counting ministerial ones), and all within this suburb, borders

which was served by Place Vendôme and Boulevard Madeleine, Rue Sausset and Rue Faubourg Saint-Honoré, Rue Anjou-Saint-Honoré and Royal Saint-Honoré. Remusat considered sanity and moderation to be the distinguishing features of the inhabitants of this suburb. Rooted in a pre-revolutionary society, not alien to the philosophy of the Enlightenment, advocating a "respectable revolution", the society that lived in the Faubourg Saint-Honoré was connected by "many ties" with the Empire. But, in the end, disillusioned with Napoleon, the Faubourg Saint-Honoré took the side of the Restoration, whose ideas, "although with some reservations, completely shared."

The reputation of the Faubourg Saint-Honoré was much less pronounced than that of the Faubourg Saint-Germain or its antipode, the Highway d'Antin quarter. According to Remus, the Faubourg Saint-Honoré was the focus of the liberal aristocracy, unlike the Faubourg Saint-Germain - - the stronghold of the Legitimist aristocracy. However, the point here was in the most subtle shades, because in the end both of them were brought together by a common origin and a common history: “Many emigrants lived here, many people whose fathers died under the guillotine knife in 1793. Even more there were noble-born people here, as well as secular people who tried their best to think like noble-born people.

In the Faubourg Saint-Honoré, secular people of two categories coexist: liberal aristocrats and foreigners, including some ambassadors.

Faubourg Saint Germain . The Faubourg Saint-Germain was located on the left bank of the Seine; from the east it was limited by a street

of the Holy Fathers, from the west - Les Invalides, from the north - the embankment of the Seine, and from the south - the fence of the Seminary of Foreign Missions. The suburb consisted of five long streets: Bourbon (after 1830 it was renamed Lille Street), University, Grenelle, Varennes, Saint-Dominique. Under Louis XV, the aristocrats fell in love with this area of ​​Paris and willingly alternated life here with a stay in Versailles. During the revolution, many noble inhabitants of the suburbs were executed, others emigrated, and the property of both was requisitioned or sold. However, from J796, a gradual return of property to the former owners began, culminating in 1825 with the adoption of a law on a billion for emigrants. The compensation received has allowed some families to upgrade their mansions.

In the era of the Restoration, all the mansions of the Faubourg Saint-Germain were again inhabited. The rue Saint-Dominique alone contained twenty-five mansions, some of which were built in the 18th or even the 17th century. The nobility of the times of the Empire and the favorites of the new government coexisted here with the ancient aristocracy. It was at this time that the main distinguishing feature of the Faubourg Saint-Germain, formerly famous for the beauty of its buildings and the comfort of its gardens, was the noble origin of its inhabitants.

In the reigns of Louis XVIII and Charles X, life in the Faubourg Saint-Germain allowed aristocrats to stay at the same time in the city and at court. To get from the Faubourg to the Tuileries, it was enough to cross the bridge. And even those more than a hundred aristocrats who occupied court posts and therefore lived in the Tuileries, left behind them houses in the Faubourg Saint-Germain, for many court service was “quarterly”. At that time, the Suburb and the courtyard completely coincided with each other. At first, the name "Saint-Germain Faubourg" denoted a real quarter where mostly aristocrats lived, but soon it acquired a symbolic meaning. The expression "Faubourg Saint-Germain", sometimes turned into "noble faubourg" or simply "Faubourg" with a capital letter, came to mean metonymically the upper stratum of the French nobility, living in Paris and revolving around the court. The expression came to mean not only aristocracy, but - more broadly - a style worthy of the old elite, suggesting an ancient elegance of language and manners. The symbol turned out to be stronger than geography. If the Faubourg Saint-Germain is not only a place, but also a style, then you can live in another area of ​​Paris and still be the embodiment of the "spirit of the Faubourg". Balzac alludes to this in "The Duchess de Lange": "Both on the Royal Place, and in the Faubourg Saint-Honoré, and in the Highway d'Antin quarter, there are Mansions where the spirit of the Faubourg Saint-Germain breathes."

Under the July Monarchy, the symbolic meaning of the expression "Saint-Germain Faubourg" became even more obvious. The representatives of the Faubourg began to include all the aristocrats who remained faithful to the older branch of the Bourbons, while the inhabitants of the Highway d'Antin and the Faubourg Saint-Honoré began to be understood as supporters of the new government or representatives of the new ruling classes. The Faubourg Saint-Germain became a symbol of loyalty , opposing betrayal, a symbol of ancient values ​​that oppose modernity.

Who lived in the Faubourg Saint-Germain? Sometimes the same family, belonging to the ancient nobility, lived in the same mansion from generation to generation. But much more often, as a result of divisions between heirs and political upheavals, mansions pass from one family to another.

Norm; solutions government agencies cannot have a religious basis.

"Currently, science is dominated by the concept of secular state as a state in which there is no official state religion and none of the creeds is recognized as obligatory and preferable. Accordingly, the secular nature of the state implies that the state and the church are separated from each other and do not interfere in each other's affairs.."

"Secularism can also act as: 1) the basis of the constitutional order; 2) political and legal principle; 3) political and legal characteristics of the state; 4) political and legal institution; 5) political and legal requirement; 6) systems of political and legal relations; 7) political and legal process."

"From a legal point of view secular state- an ideologically neutral state that fundamentally does not accept any worldview (including religious or anti-religious) as an official ideology, providing citizens with the opportunity for a free worldview choice.

secularity the state implies its indifference in the ideological sphere, i.e., the rejection of special control (non-intervention subject to compliance with the law), non-identification (due to the impossibility of creating scientific criteria), renunciation of special privileges, separation and equidistance from ideological organizations. From the point of view of the priority of the legal approach, it is legally correct to define the secularity of the state as ideological neutrality, since legal definition"religion", and therefore "religious", does not exist. Only in this case, secularism is one of the most important guarantees of freedom of worldview choice.

The legislation of a secular state may correspond (in whole or in part) to religious norms; "Secularism" is determined not by the presence of contradictions with religious attitudes, but by freedom from them. For example, a ban on abortion is a secular decision if it is justified by general humanistic considerations (more precisely, medical and biological expediency), and not by religious prerequisites.

In a secular state, every person has the right to expect that he can live without resorting to religious institutions. For example, the conclusion of marriages and the administration of justice is the prerogative of the state in it. In a secular state, followers of all religions are equal before the law.

Religion is not completely separated from the state in Israel either.

The principle of secularism presupposes the separation of the state from religious dogmas, but does not mean the removal of religion from public life. It also contributes to the delimitation of the spheres of influence of the state and religious organizations while maintaining the role of the state as the main form of organization of socio-political power.

In sociological science, a typology of secular and non-secular states is presented for various reasons. Criteria for classifying secular states: 1) the existence of a partnership between the state and religious organizations and 2) the degree of influence of religion on legal system states. These criteria allow us to distinguish 4 types of secular states: preferential, equipotential(the state strives for the maximum possible isolation of religious organizations from public life), contaminated, identificational(cooperation of the state with religious organizations).

Different types of secular states that exist in modern world, are a natural result of the development of society. The formation of a certain type of secular state is due to specific historical, political, cultural and other features of social dynamics.

Encyclopedic YouTube

    1 / 1

    ✪ Atheistic digest #110. Secular state for clergy

Norm; decisions of state bodies cannot have a religious justification.

The legislation of a secular state may correspond (in whole or in part) to religious norms; "Secularism" is determined not by the presence of contradictions with religious attitudes, but by freedom from them. For example, a ban on abortion is a secular decision if it is justified by general humanistic considerations (more precisely, medical and biological expediency), and not by religious prerequisites. The announcement of a religious holiday as a day off is quite acceptable in a secular state in order to create comfortable conditions for the believing part of the population.

In a secular state, every person has the right to expect that he can live without resorting to religious institutions. For example, marriages and the administration of justice should be the prerogative of the state. In a secular state, followers of all faiths are equal before the law.

At present, all countries of the European cultural tradition, Russia, a number of countries in Southeast Asia are secular. Most Muslim countries do not fully meet the criteria for secularism. So, Iran and Saudi Arabia are officially theocratic states, in the constitutions of most Arab countries it is written that their legislation is based on the Koran and Sharia, the religious form of marriage is the only possible one. In Malaysia, in recent years there has been a departure from a secular state (there was a religious police acting selectively against Muslims). Of the states with a predominance of the Muslim population, formally secular are, for example, Turkey and a number of CIS countries. Religion is not completely separated from the state in Israel either.

see also

  • Decree on the separation of church from state and school from church

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010 .

See what "Secular society" is in other dictionaries:

    Exist., number of synonyms: 1 fashion (7) ASIS synonym dictionary. V.N. Trishin. 2013 ... Synonym dictionary

    Ex., s., use. very often Morphology: (no) what? society, why? society, (see) what? society what? society about what? about society; pl. what? society, (no) what? societies, why? societies, (see) what? society than? societies about what? about… … Dictionary of Dmitriev

    SOCIETY- one of the most ambiguous concepts social philosophy applied to the definition of a part of the material world isolated from nature, associated with activity and special relationship between people. The framework of the theory of society is formed by categories: ... ... Eurasian wisdom from A to Z. Explanatory dictionary

    SOCIETY- 1) a set of historically established forms of joint activity and communication of people; 2) as a stage of human history (primitive, feudal or medieval, bourgeois, socialist, communist, slave or ancient ... ... Thematic philosophical dictionary

    This article needs to be completely rewritten. There may be explanations on the talk page ... Wikipedia

    English society, secular; German Gesellschaft, weltliche. According to G. Burns and G. Becker, a society characterized by readiness for innovation, focused on expedient rationality and instrumental effectiveness of actions. Antinazi.… … Encyclopedia of Sociology

    society- Wednesday; circle of acquaintances. Aristocratic, well-mannered (obsolete), decent (obsolete), noble, brilliant, big, violent, high-society, cheerful, educated, higher, dirty (colloquial), ladies', bad, female, lively, chosen, ... ... Dictionary of epithets

    The International Society of Bible Students is a religious movement that emerged in the 1870s in the United States. Its founder was the preacher Charles Taze Russell. Charles Taze Russell Contents 1 History ... Wikipedia

    Carillon Sacré Coeur: The traditional flag of the Society, which became the model for the modern flag of Quebec. Society of Saint John Crete ... Wikipedia

Books

  • Is it possible to be good and not be saved? , . Today, more than ever, there is an urgent need to formulate clear and precise criteria that would make it possible to distinguish true path to God from the false. Christians who are blinded by lies...
  • American tragedy. Book 2, Theodore Dreiser. Happiness comes to those who know how to wait. - Yes, of course, just look, don't spend your whole life in the waiting room. Dreiser wrote of the story behind his novel: “I…

secular society

noun, number of synonyms: 1

Fashion (7)


  • - in a broad sense, a set of historically established forms of joint activity of people. O. acts as a special, highest stage in the development of living systems ...

    Demographic Encyclopedic Dictionary

  • - in a broad sense - a large group of people united by some common goal with stable social boundaries ...

    Human ecology. Conceptual and terminological dictionary

  • - ...

    Analytical Psychology Dictionary

  • - cm....

    Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • - a concept that fixes the subject of social philosophy: as a basic categorical structure, it substantiates concepts that develop in line with social realism ...

    The latest philosophical dictionary

  • - A set of people united by historically conditioned social forms life together and activities...

    Dictionary of sociolinguistic terms

  • - A set of people united by historically conditioned social forms of joint life and activity, existing, functioning and developing in the process of social interaction between its ...

    General linguistics. Sociolinguistics: Dictionary-Reference

  • - 1. a set of people united by historically conditioned social forms of joint life and activity; 2. a circle of people united by a common position, origin, interests; 3...

    Big accounting dictionary

  • - a state in which there is no official, state religion and none of the creeds is recognized as obligatory or preferable ...

    Law Encyclopedia

  • - one of the main oppositions of history and philosophy of history ...

    Philosophical Encyclopedia

  • - ....
  • - 1) the population of the country, its citizens, considered in conjunction with their history, interests, needs, desires, beliefs, behavior, psychology O. - this is a community of people endowed with will and consciousness, ...

    encyclopedic Dictionary economics and law

  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Economics and Law

  • - the constitutional and legal characteristic of the state, meaning the separation of the church from the state, the delimitation of their spheres of activity ...

    Big Law Dictionary

  • - Adverb, number of synonyms: 1 per person...

    Synonym dictionary

  • - noun, number of synonyms: 1 fashion ...

    Synonym dictionary

"secular society" in books

CHAPTER II Lyceum, secular society and military service

From the book In Search of Marcel Proust by Maurois Andre

CHAPTER II Lyceum, secular society and military service Pleasure is a sign

Dantes' resentment against St. Petersburg secular society

From the book Posthumously Defendant author Naumov Anatoly Valentinovich

Dantes' resentment against St. Petersburg secular society That's all that is in the official materials of the military court case about the duel. However, there is a document that, due to its content, should have been placed in it, but for one reason or another is missing. February 26, 1837

Social disco at Le Jardin

From the book History of DJs by Brewster Bill

Secular disco at Le Jardin On June 13, 1973, a club opened in Manhattan, which to some extent became a reflection of the fire island scene and showed the direction of disco development. It played about the same music as in the black lofts of Greenwich Village, but from the point

Chapter 5 Secular Society

From the author's book

Chapter 5 Secular society In addition to the faces of employees - officials, officers, a certain part of the urban population, especially in the pre-reform period and especially in winters, when boredom reigned in the snow-covered estates, was the non-serving local nobility. And the famous part

Secular beginnings and Italianisms

From the book Guide to the Art Gallery of the Imperial Hermitage author Benois Alexander Nikolaevich

The secular beginning and Italianisms In the future, Netherlandish painting, remaining predominantly religious until the iconoclastic movement of the second half of the 16th century, nevertheless continues to follow the same path of “secularization”. Gradually, traces of the church spirit disappear from it and

Enter secular society

From the book Nine grams in the heart ... (autobiographical prose) author Okudzhava Bulat Shalvovich

Entering a secular society How could I understand how beautiful people are until I got here? My eighth graders sit in front of me motionless. They don't know much yet, but they are beautiful and they are mine. Illiteracy is still sweet for them, but it is not their fault. And gold autumn swiftly

secular art

From the book Byzantines [Heirs of Rome (litres)] author Rice David Talbot

Secular art If we consider the art of Byzantium as a whole, it certainly should be called religious and Christian (photos 61–63). Of course, there were exceptions, and many things that have come down to us are objects of secular art. These are both mosaic floors and a group

Secular education in Europe

From the book Another History of Science. From Aristotle to Newton author Kalyuzhny Dmitry Vitalievich

Secular education in Europe The original Roman (Byzantine) empire, which united most of the countries of Eurasia, by the 5th century had turned into a conglomerate of countries that were largely independent, but recognized the Constantinople hierarch (kaisar

1.2.7. The fifth meaning of the word "society" is a society of a certain type in general (a type of society, or a particular society)

From the book Philosophy of History author Semenov Yuri Ivanovich

1.2.7. The fifth meaning of the word “society” is a society of a certain type in general (a type of society, or a special society). Socio-historical organisms have existed and still exist in a huge number. It is impossible to understand this multitude without classifying sociohistorical

6. The fifth meaning of the word "society" is a society of a certain type in general (a type of society, or a particular society)

From the book Course of Lectures on Social Philosophy author Semenov Yuri Ivanovich

6. The fifth meaning of the word "society" is a society of a certain type in general (a type of society, or a special society). Socio-historical organisms have existed and still exist in great numbers. It is impossible to understand this multitude without classifying sociohistorical

Secular state

From the book Encyclopedia of a Lawyer author author unknown

Secular state A secular state is a state in which there is no official, state religion and none of the creeds is recognized as obligatory or preferable. In S.g. religion, its canons and dogmas, as well as religious associations,

Irina Prokhorova. Secular society and traditionalist consciousness

From the book Why is our world the way it is [Nature. Human. Society (compilation)] author Krongauz Maxim Anisimovich

Irina Prokhorova. Secular society and traditionalist consciousness Irina Prokhorova - Literary critic, publisher, TV presenter.Events recent years created a deep split in Russian society, which has long maintained a visible tolerance for diversity

Russia is a secular state

From the book Truth and Fiction about the Kremlin Necropolis and the Mausoleum author Abramov Alexey

Russia is a secular state "I agree with the Patriarch of All Russia Alexy II - this is not human, not Christian," President B. Yeltsin recently said in an interview with Izvestiya. million Muslims

2. Secular education St. Irenaeus

From the book of Saint Irenaeus of Lyons. His life and literary activity of the author

2. Secular education St. Irenaeus In one of his writings, Tertullian calls Irenaeus "the most diligent researcher of all sciences (omnium doctrinarum curiosissimus explorator)". One might think that this review contains, among other things, an indication of the acquaintance of St. father with secular sciences.

2.2. Secular fellowship

From the book Correct Dating. Networking without secrets author Anderson Burt

2.2. Secular Communication In addition to the rules of address, you will also need the ability to conduct small talk well. In fact, mastering the art of conversation is not difficult, you just need to give yourself the trouble to get acquainted with the basic rules of secular communication. The first and most important rule.

I would love to celebrate this anniversary of the 1905 law, but the truth is that clouds are gathering on the horizon of secular society.

It's about about a complex concept that goes far beyond the relationship to religion and, apparently, is beyond the understanding of our leadership due to its lack of political culture.

A secular society is a search for civil peace against the backdrop of recognizing the inability of religions to provide it, or even their propensity to generate violence (it is in this case becomes more and more uncontrollable as it is justified and sublimated by faith). But that's not all. A secular society is a condition for human emancipation, since it proposes to lay the basis for sovereignty, legitimacy of power and relations of citizens with reason, and not with submission to some external order established from above.

Secular society relies on the creative forces of man, his ability to choose and create his own laws. That is why it represents, first of all, an attitude towards citizenship, and should be considered in the field of a person's relations with other people, and not with faith.

Secular society assumes that a person belongs only to himself. It is not determined by (only) gender, skin color, social position and faith, but by his unique existence, by what he brings to the world, what he builds together with other people. In this sense, secular society is freedom, but at the same time it represents a struggle against determinism and alienation. It is in this struggle that free judgment is born.

By the way, one person in the Macron government has perfectly reflected this issue. I could not even imagine that Marlène Schiappa could present such a pleasant surprise. Be that as it may, on December 8 she declared in the “Great East”: “Secular society is not ecumenism. This is not a pie that is handed out in pieces to representatives of different faiths, including atheists. (…) It is the secular nature of society that makes it possible to avoid communitarianism. It is he who turns us into a single nation, and not into a yarrow or a collection of communities. Well said, nothing to add here. Only such clear statements on this topic are heard only from her.

With a young deputy from the Forward, Republic! For Aurélien Taché, everything is exactly the opposite: the iron-official language turns his words about secular society into something completely incomprehensible. But it is also for the best, because if you start listening, you understand that his position means blindness towards Islamism and contempt for the defenders of secular society, who are equated with right-wing radicals.

Islamism does not exist in Aurélien Tachet's picture of the world, and France is a kind of theoretical country where there was no unprecedented wave of terrorist attacks directed against her way of life. Discourse on secular society is conducted without mentioning the reasons why this issue is so acute today. The MP condemns the "aggression" of the defenders of the secular system and wonders why the issue is raised in such a tense atmosphere. In other words, he hints that the intensity of passions does not subside precisely through their fault ...

Only now he completely forgets the totalitarian nature of Islamism, its rejection of what we are, its desire to undermine our civil and political mores, its hatred of democracy, women, Jews and everything that does not belong to it. He forgets that this ideology kindles a fire not only in our country, but all over the world. He forgets the return of rape as a weapon of oppression of women, the restoration of slavery, homosexuals thrown from rooftops, the murder of people who refused to convert to Islam... That is, all the horrors of life under the rule of Islamists. He forgets that the model of society desired by the Islamists is categorically rejected by all the French, regardless of their origin. As a result, his discourse about reconciliation and surprise at the current tension sound extremely false and even suggestive of manipulation (she looks extremely rude and, therefore, all the more stupid). In addition, the young man carefully avoids the word "Islamism" because it harms the fantasy he needs to sell: secular fundamentalists are obsessed with the issue of Muslims and Islam.

But it seems to me that we are dealing with a completely unreasonable position, with people who imagine themselves to be strategists, reversing the old campaigns of party apparatchiks. Waltz is now striving to become the epitome of a secular and republican path that can potentially attract the French, who are extremely worried about encroachments on their way of life (besides, no one defends it). Therefore, the provincial Sun Tzu believe that they need to put at least some figure on the cage of secular society as soon as possible in order to show that it is busy. Even if this person understands little in this matter (this does not mean that the young deputy we mentioned does not have other knowledge and skills, but in terms of secular society, he is completely inexperienced and extremely naive). Most of Macron's entourage do not understand that politics includes not only governance, but also existential and identity issues, they believe that they can actually reconcile the country not by asserting and implementing principles, but by using children's fairy tales in a stupidly conciliatory wrapper. They repeat Hollande's synthesis, in which no one else decides or creates anything. This has already killed a great party and is now undermining a great country. Our country.

The very fact of putting Charlie and Plenel on the same level in the rhetoric of the government, that is, a newspaper that became the target of political assassinations, a symbol of freedom of speech and a victim of Islamist aggression, and one of those who allowed the voting rights of the Islamists and the unforgettable “Indigenous people of the republic” to be legalized, testifies to a deplorable shortcoming common sense.

Even worse, this simplistic and unfair comparison is made to discredit the defenders of secular society, to deprive them of legitimacy. After all, they are the main threat to our country. They need to be dealt with urgently. A number of members of the government pretend to deplore the tensions over secular society, glossing over the fact that it is being attacked by real ideologues determined to undermine our existence. After all, in the fairy-tale world of national reconciliation, the ruling party of terrorism no longer exists, and the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood ( terrorist organization banned in the Russian Federation - ed..) and other Salafists does not create tension in schools, universities, hospitals, workplaces, unions and parties ... The problem is not the rise of a radical religious political ideology and not all new crimes, but the hysteria of the defenders of secular society playing on the fears ... I'm afraid that if they have gone so far in denial, the fall can be very painful. To the President and his movement “Forward!” it is not known that the French are aware of the reality of the threat, and that denial (even if it has been renamed into tolerance) only reinforces the feeling of abandonment.

If Emmanuel Macron behaves as inconsistently on this issue, he will fail to reconcile France. On December 8, on the eve of this anniversary, representatives of the main French religions were received at the Elysee Palace to discuss ... secular society. This is tantamount to talking about abstinence with porn actor Rocco Siffredi… It is time for Emmanuel Macron to understand that ecumenism and religious consent, of course, have every right to exist, but have nothing to do with secular society. Do not relax, Mr. President!

Subscribe to us